AI-powered resume tools for students & job seekers Free to start No credit card Trusted by job seekers
ReachRole Your Career. A Step Ahead.

DevOps project

Build a CI pipeline that actually fails on a broken PR

A GitHub Actions pipeline for lint, test, and build — proven by intentionally breaking a test and watching the pipeline correctly go red.

6-9 hoursEstimated time
IntermediateDifficulty
5Graded criteria
RepoWhat you submit

The brief

Set up a GitHub Actions pipeline for a repository: lint and run tests on every pull request, build a Docker image on merge to main, and cache dependencies so runs are fast. Document the branch protection rule that makes this check required (it can't be exported as a file, so screenshot or describe the setting). Then break a test on purpose in a PR and confirm the pipeline correctly fails.

Suggested stack

GitHub Actions Docker

What you hand in

  • A public GitHub repository with the workflow file(s) and a README
  • A link to (or screenshot of) a PR where the pipeline correctly failed on a broken test
  • The README documents the branch protection setting and dependency caching approach

Grading happens against the rubric below, so read it before you start — not after.

How this is graded

Published in advance and weighted out of 100. Nothing here is a surprise.

Pipeline correctness 30 pts

The pipeline genuinely fails when lint or tests fail — proven with a real broken-test PR, not just described as working.

Caching and speed 20 pts

Dependencies are cached between runs (e.g. actions/cache or built-in package manager caching), and a re-run is measurably faster than a cold run.

Build stage produces a working image 25 pts

The Docker image built on merge to main actually runs correctly when pulled and started.

Branch protection documentation 15 pts

The required-check setting is clearly documented (screenshot or precise steps) since it lives in repo settings, not in a file.

Finish 10 pts

No console errors or crashes, no broken layout, no leftover placeholder text or commented-out code.

Why this project is worth your weekend

  • CI is the daily-driver tool of both DevOps and backend work, and most candidates have only ever copy-pasted a workflow file without verifying it actually catches failures.
  • A pipeline that reports green even when a test fails is worse than no pipeline, because it creates false confidence — this project is specifically designed to prove it doesn't.
  • Caching discipline is a small decision with a large, checkable effect on how fast a team's feedback loop is.

Where people lose points

  • A workflow that reports success even when the test command actually failed, because its exit code isn't checked or is swallowed by a later step.
  • No dependency caching, so every run reinstalls everything from scratch and takes minutes longer than it needs to.
  • Secrets or API tokens hardcoded directly into the workflow YAML instead of stored as GitHub Actions secrets.

Other DevOps projects

Two or three of these turn an empty resume into a portfolio.

Back to the roadmap

Built it? Get it scored against this rubric.

Submit your work and get a score on every criterion above, written feedback, and three resume bullets you can use straight away.

Submit for grading Add project to your ATS resume Free to start. Grading uses one AI action.